A Tale of Two Parties: Would You Like Coffee or Tea With Your Liberal Bias?

Nothing says “media bias” like coffee in the morning.

If anyone ever wanted to see an example of the bias of the Old Media, no better example can be found than the different ways that it has treated the Tea Party movement and the “Coffee Party” astroturf effort. The Tea Party movement was initially ignored, then it was ridiculed, then it was attacked as dangerous, but almost nowhere in the Old Media was it treated as a valid, powerful political movement, despite the literally millions of Americans who have attended its rallies.

[youtube WgRGxuVP0_I nolink]

On the other hand, the astroturf “coffee party” effort created by a former Obama campaign staffer was treated as a viable, important effort from the second it was announced, and despite the fact that no “coffee party” event seems to have been able to turn out more than 20 people at a time.

Let’s look at some numbers. Just from those first tax day Tea Party events (April 15, 2009) the number of participants topped 500,000. Since then, there have been thousands of more Tea Party protests of all sorts sponsored by any number of local and national groups and they, too, have turned out thousands of participants. There have been Tea Party participants in the millions since April of 2009.

Of course, the Old Media has done its best to downplay the number of Tea Party protestors. Instead of detailing the actual numbers, the Old Media continues to use the nebulous phrase “hundreds of protestors,” or when the numbers are greater the dismissive “thousands of protestors.” An excellent example of this can be seen during the great Washington, D.C. protest of September, 2009. Where the foreign press noted that as many as a million people had flooded Washington D.C. on September 12, 2009, the American Old Media insisted on using the less accurate phrase “tens of thousands.” When asked to quantify a million people no one would use the phrase “tens of thousands,” unless, of course, they were trying to diminish the amount.

[youtube SMoQDKHYM74 nolink]

Also since April of 2009, we have seen Tea Party groups begin a foray into local politics. From coast to coast Tea Party groups have been holding candidate forums, endorsing candidates, and proffering candidates from their own ranks. Now, we are still at a nascent stage of these electoral efforts, so it is difficult to say what will come of it. But the fact is, they’ve begun at various levels from north to south and east to west.

On top of all of that, Tea Party events have been held in every state and have been seen to turn out hundreds and thousands even in liberal areas of the country. But have we seen even a begrudging respect for all this activism by the Old Media?

Sadly, even a year after this Tea Party movement began, a year after the energy and importance of this movement has been proven, a year after it has been seen to have produced an outpouring into the streets of millions of Americans that had never in their lives attended a protest — even with many of them never before having involved themselves in politics at all — we still have seen no respect for the Tea Partiers from the Old Media.

Here are just a tiny number of examples of the Old Media still attacking the tea partiers since 2009:

• New York Times’s Paul Krugman: Tea parties are fake astroturf
• Time Magazine’s Joe Klein: Tea partiers are racists
• New York Times: Tom Freidman says Tea Partiers are setting up an assassination atmosphere
• MSNBC: Tea partiers are offensive
• Newsweek: Tea parties are loud, mad, and dangerous
• The AP: Tea Party filled with extremists
• Columbus Dispatch: Tea party is extreme right-wing

Of course, there are hundreds and hundreds more examples like this in every corner of the Old Media. The Old Media has almost exclusively presented the Tea Party movement as fringe, dangerous, racist, yet ultimately unimportant. The Old Media has done its level best to undermine the Tea Party movement as much as possible, and continues to do so.

And then came the so-called “coffee party” effort. Just as Paul Krugman (among others) falsely claimed that the Tea Party movement was a fake, astroturf movement, they’ve treated the “coffee party” events differently by refusing to report it as the astroturf it is. The “coffee party” was invented by Annabel Park, a member of Barack Obama’s political campaign.

These “coffee party” events created by an Obama operative have been held in many Democrat strongholds but far fewer Republican areas. Not only have the “coffee party” events been far, far fewer in number, they’ve also been sparsely attended. Almost no “coffee party” effort has fielded more than 20 attendees, a far cry from the hundreds, thousands and hundreds of thousands of attendees that have attended Tea Party events. Yet despite the paltry turnout, the Old Media has treated the “coffee party” events as equal in seriousness to the Tea Party.

For instance, Newsweek recently published a story with the absurd claim that 200,000 “coffee party” members have turned out across the country. What is Newsweek’s proof that there are 200,000 members of the “coffee party?” Not attendance at events, that’s for sure. No, what was used as proof was the “coffee party” Facebook page that shows that over 200,000 people “like” the page. 200,000 “likes” on Facebook, however, does not translate into 200,000 members of the “coffee party.”

Since its debut a few months ago, this “coffee party” business has been treated quite well. Here are just a few of the laudatory stories on the “coffee party” effort:

• NBC: Virginia coffee party outlines goals
• Houston Chronicle: Coffee party making politics civil
• St. Louis Area: Coffee party big success in Belleville (7 participants showed)
• CBS: Is coffee party the next big thing?
• New York Times: Coffee party wonderful civic participation
• U.S. News: Coffee party kinder and gentler
• CNN: giving astroturfer room to say Why I started the coffee party

The Old Media has bent over backwards to assist the “coffee party” effort, going so far as to publish one article that even made excuses for why the “coffee party” events never seem to have more than 20 folks turn out to them! The Chicago Sun-Times group recently published a story excusing the paltry numbers as somehow being done on purpose! Catch this folderol:

Coffee Parties are often kept intentionally small to facilitate conversation among members. The Naperville group, according to Harrington, typically sees about 10 members per meeting — the right size, he says, for making sure everybody is heard.

Oh, yeah, every grassroots political movement purposefully sets out to have as few people as possible catch the fever! Give me a break.

And let us remember that this “coffee party” astroturf effort to push Obama’s agenda has not resulted in any political momentum. Nearly universally, the “coffee party” gatherings have featured about a dozen participants who get together and spin their wheels, all of whom then go home all ultimately to no effect. No candidates have claimed to be the “coffee party candidate,” no political candidates forums have been sponsored by coffee partiers and no candidates have stepped forth from the “coffee party” ranks. Additionally no large rallies have been held by “coffee party” groups to compete with the wild success of the Tea Party movement.

And yet the Old Media has treated the “coffee party” movement with the utmost respect and presented it as a viable opposing option to the Tea Party movement despite its paltry turnout and its nonexistent political influence. Meanwhile, the millions of Tea Party members, their political candidates and influence is ignored, ridiculed and attacked by that same Old Media.

Yes, if there is no other example of the bias in the Old Media, this story does it.