Exposing Rachel Maddow As a Fraud In 16 Seconds Flat

Rachel Maddow, whose special on Timothy McVeigh airs on MSNBC tonight, is quite the investigative reporter. Not long ago, she obtained explosive evidence of James O’Keefe’s wardrobe fraud, and she has unleashed it on both of her viewers.

Thanks to ACORN’s District Attorney, Jerry Brown, Maddow was able to expose this frame of heavily edited video which proves the ACORN sting was all a fraud! Conclusive proof that James O’keefe was not dressed like a pimp at all.

Maddow: [Excitedly] “Check out the unedited tape! ….Now wait a second here. You see that dress shir… wah… pinstripes there. You see that dress shirt that’s visible as Mr. O’Keefe opens the door and exits the office? It’s a dress shirt. What happened to the fur and the 1970 blacksploitation Superfly outfit?…. But the pimp outfit thing is just the start….You were had.

Wow! what an amazing piece of investigative journalism she has produced. She found the smoking pinstripes!

Sadly for Rachel Maddow, It only takes 16 seconds to reveal that she’s an incompetent boob and a fraud, who never bothered to watch the very first video in the series before pushing the fraudulent narrative that ACORN is a victim of unfair political attacks.

From our March 3rd post on this ridiculous matter:

Interestingly, anyone who watches the videos, can clearly see what James O’Keefe was wearing when he walked into the ACORN offices, and captured them on tape appearing to conspire to commit copious amounts of fraud.

16 seconds into the video below, the whole ugly truth is exposed for the world to see, because the filmmaker never hid the fact that he was wearing khakis when ACORN employees were recorded offering him advice on how to relocate his prostitute girlfriend into a shiny new government financed brothel filed with underage illegal alien prostitutes.

[youtube LtTnizEnC1U nolink]

16 seconds into the video above, it becomes clear that attempting to portray O’Keefe as a liar about his wardrobe can only be journalistic fraud and/or malpractice.

Question for Rachel Maddow: Do you have to pay Jon Stewart for the right portray a completely moronic and humorless version of him? Seriously, you are like Bizzarro Stewart.

[youtube TmBxzPix7O8 nolink]

Advice for Rachel Maddow: If you are going to be a soulless shill who makes excuses for an organization which repeatedly exhibited a willingness to commit federal crimes involving the sexual exploitation of immigrant children, at least attempt to be original.