Americans’ Preference for Larger Families Reaches 50-Year High
Americans’ preference for larger families — having three or more children — has reached its highest percentage since 1971, a new Gallup survey found.
Americans’ preference for larger families — having three or more children — has reached its highest percentage since 1971, a new Gallup survey found.
A majority of Democrats say the trend of people having fewer children has a “positive impact” on the environment, according to a Pew Research Center survey.
Jordan Peterson said those claiming the existence of “climate change” and “overpopulation” propose policies that will “kill the poor.”
The fear mongering about how climate change will annihilate the planet is leading some young people to decide not to have children.
In a bizarre exchange with children, Boris Johnson seemingly joked that feeding humans to animals could aid the conservation of wildlife.
Tracy Stone-Manning, President Joe Biden’s nominee to be director of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), described American children as an “environmental hazard” while advocating for slowing U.S. population growth in her 1992 graduate thesis.
Giving birth to a child is “the worst thing you can do” to the climate, says philosophy professor Patricia MacCormack of Anglia Ruskin University.
Just about every nation in the Western world is grappling with a demographic crisis of one sort or another, as are major Asian powers like Japan and China.
This year marks the 50th anniversary of Paul Ehrlich’s eco-doom bestseller The Population Bomb. Maybe we should all stage a mass die-in to spare the distinguished Stanford biology professor his embarrassment.
In a provocative new essay, NBC News Think claims that science has proven that having kids is bad for the environment and therefore “having many children is wrong, or at least morally suspect.”
On Wednesday the global environmentalist movement commemorated “Earth Overshoot Day,” which marks the moment when the world population has supposedly consumed all the earth’s resources allocated for the year—fruit and vegetables, meat and fish, water and wood—and so began to “overexploit” the planet.
Just when you thought the hyped-up rhetoric among climate alarmists couldn’t get any more shrill, a new report has declared that a new era of “biological annihilation” is already underway on earth.
In unguarded comments following the recent G20 meetings, French Prime Minister Emmanuel Macron chided African nations for having too many children, bringing an avalanche of accusations of racism crashing down upon his head.
This week the global environmentalist movement commemorated “Earth Overshoot Day,” which marks the moment when the world population had supposedly consumed all the earth’s resources allocated for 2016—fruit and vegetables, meat and fish, water and wood—and so began to “overexploit” the planet.
In the face of falling birthrates in much of the developed world, Pope Francis and Christian leader James Dobson have sounded the alarm of global under-population, calling on families to reevaluate the gift of children and larger families. In his
According to China’s state-run Xinhua news agency, hospitals have been overwhelmed by a surge of babies following the end of the nation’s one-child population-control policy.
The Zika virus outbreak is exposing a ghastly secret that the environmentalist movement wants hidden, even if the cost is more Zika-babies.
Politics makes us stupid. That was Ezra Klein’s thumbnail version of a dilemma social science says exists at the core of all political journalism.
A scientist who believes the world is overpopulated by 6 billion people has been appointed by Pope Francis to the Pontifical Academy of Science.