Neil Ferguson

The British government is reportedly drafting plans for a two-week “circuit breaker” lockdown amid doomsday predictions from scientific advisors.

Social distancing could return in the Winter if there is a “significant uptick” in hospital admissions for the Chinese coronavirus, but a “full-blown lockdown” is unlikely, Professor Neil Ferguson has said.

Chris Whitty announced on Monday that children from the ages of 12 to 15 years old will be offered coronavirus vaccinations in England.

Imperial College London’s Professor Neil Ferguson had predicted there could be a “large wave of infection” once children go back to school and white-collar workers return to their offices this Autumn, in the latest doom scenario offered by one of the architects of Britain’s lockdown policies.

This is bad news, obviously, for Hancock’s wife and children. But it’s great news for everyone else…

Meet Sir David King, climate jackal. He and his fellow scavengers are moving in to feed on the denuded carcass of our freedoms.

A leading Conservative lockdown-sceptic MP has said that Britain will need to learn to live with the Chinese virus rather than submit to the “doom-mongering” put forward by the likes of Professor Neil Ferguson.

Looking forward to your summer holiday? Well, it may not happen if Neil Ferguson (aka Professor Pantsdown) gets his way. The disgraced computer modeller from Imperial College has been warning on BBC radio about yet another deadly COVID-19 variant.

Britain’s lockdown, that in turn inspired that in the U.S? None of it would have been possible without the shining example of China.

Professor Neil Ferguson has been confirmed to be advising Prime Minister Boris Johnson’s government on coronavirus, despite officially resigning in May for breaching his own lockdown restrictions to meet with his married lover.

Tier 4 lockdown restrictions could be enforced across the whole of England as a new strain of the Chinese coronavirus spreads across the country, the government’s chief scientific adviser has said. While the architect of the first lockdown claimed that Tier 4 could last until April.

The green agenda IS the Great Reset. One of the few political leaders who gets this is President Donald Trump.

The British government may “allow” the people to have up to five days of relaxation of the coronavirus restrictions over Christmas — at the cost of spending most of January under lockdown.

The disgraced former government advisor, Professor Neil Ferguson, has said that there could be a third nationwide lockdown in January.

The disgraced former British government scientist who was forced to leave his post after breaking his own lockdown rules has said that “people will die” if social distancing regulations are suspended, and families are allowed to spend Christmas day together.

Boris Johnson’s science advisers have released a scary new graph designed to terrify the British populace into accepting a second lockdown.

Prime Minister Boris Johnson has announced a set of draconian coronavirus restrictions, including fines of up to £10,000 for breaching self-isolation, as the Mayor of London floated the idea of a second lockdown and curfews in the British capital.

Van Morrison has released three new protest songs accusing the UK government of being ‘fascist bullies disturbing our peace.’

A recent report claims that leading figures in the data science industry believe that the computer code developed by Professor Neil Ferguson, which convinced governments that lockdown was the best choice to prevent the spread of the Wuhan coronavirus, was “totally unreliable.”

The British university behind the doomsday coronavirus projections that resulted in the introduction of national lockdown restrictions has signed a deal with Chinese tech giant Huawei to build tech centres on its campus in West London.

The UK’s coronavirus lockdown was caused by “the most devastating software mistake of all time, in terms of economic costs and lives lost,” according to a report by The Telegraph this weekend.

The computer model is so poor, it is ‘somewhere between negligence and unintentional but grave scientific misconduct’, an expert has warned.

A virologist and clinical computational epidemiologist has slammed the Chinese virus model created by fellow epidemiologist Dr. Neil Ferguson of Imperial College London, whose dire mathematical models of the Wuhan coronavirus’s spread formed the basis for lockdowns in the U.K. and around the world. Scientist Chris von Csefalvay labeled Ferguson’s work “somewhere between negligence and unintentional but grave scientific misconduct.”

To be clear: it is now surely well past the point of reasonable doubt that Ferguson’s study is a busted flush, entirely unfit for purpose.

Professor Neil Ferguson is currently the most mocked man in Britain. Such a pity, though, that it’s for all the wrong reasons…

There are increased calls for the British government to release the modelling upon which the national lockdown was based after it was revealed that its author, Professor Neil Ferguson, was found to have been flouting the social distancing rules in order to visit his left-wing activist married lover.

London’s Metropolitan Police Service has confirmed that it will not investigate further into disgraced former government scientific adviser Neil Ferguson breaking the country’s lockdown laws by allowing his married mistress to visit his home, merely saying that his actions were “disappointing”.

Failed Trump challenger Hillary Clinton (D) on Tuesday warned that “Americans will suffer” as the Trump administration signaled it is engaging in “preliminary talks” to shut down the coronavirus task force.

The UK scientist whose predictions triggered the lockdown has resigned his govt position after he broke his own rules meet his married lover. 

Britain’s lockdown is based on the computer modelling of a scientist with a track record of failed predictions and whose widely-criticised methodology is subject to such secrecy, he still has not released the source code underpinning his model.

What if the experts our governments are relying on to give them policy advice are the wrong experts? We can’t vote scientists out of office…