Some in the sports media are unhappy that NBC sports analyst Tony Dungy often slips his Christian ideas into his sports analysis. However, many of these same reporters have no problem praising athletes for their anthem protests and political activism.
A recent piece on Dungy by The Big Lead’s Kyle Koster, raised concerns about how Dungy’s Christian perspective impacts his job as an analyst.
Koster noted that Dungy makes a point of highlighting Super Bowl-winning quarterback Nick Foles’ Christian faith, and, the fact that Foles credits God for his success. The writer relates two recent Dungy tweets saying, “You’ll notice a common theme.”
Dungy faced some backlash on Twitter for his tweets, he replied to the criticism by saying that NBC hired him to give hi analysis and that is exactly what he is doing:
Of Dungy’s tweets, Koster claims, “it would be naive to think Dungy trumpeting the benefits of faith is something being done from a distance while only wearing an analyst’s hat:”
His long history of evangelizing must be weighed. Would Dungy have credited another faith for grounding a quarterback? Would he have credited the birth of a child or a social awakening? I am not passing judgment, or suggesting he wouldn’t have. But it’s worth wondering.
Dungy, a very public and proud Christian, pushed a narrative favorable to Christianity that may or may not be true. His possible agenda should come into play here, just as it would if an outspoken vegan was trumpeting Tom Brady’s revolutionary diet or an outspoken atheist crediting Arian Foster’s worldview for his performance.
Koster concludes saying that NBC and the public should “check” Dungy, “when his beliefs seep into his analyst role.”
Though, it’s harder to find examples of Koster calling for the NFL to “check” players when they venture into politics. If we have to be watchful to ensure that Dungy’s “agenda” doesn’t get mixed with his role as an analyst, then why should the political agenda of football players be allowed to mix with their job?
More examples of this convenient omission can be found elsewhere in the sports world.
Take the February 1 piece by Will Bunch who exclaimed that the protests of Malcolm Jenkins and Chris Long renewed his interest in football, merely because they were infusing their social justice agenda into the game.
If players can be allowed to infuse politics into their job, thus winning back the affections of politically sympathetic people like Will Bunch. Then why can’t Tony Dungy win back the affections of Christians by sharing the story of Nick Foles’ faith?
Follow Warner Todd Huston on Twitter @warnerthuston.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.