Aug. 27 (UPI) — Mark Zuckerberg said in a letter to the Republican-led House Judiciary Committee on Monday that he should have been more outspoken about pressure from the White House to delete some COVID-19-related content it found objectionable.
In a letter addressed to House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, Zuckerberg said Biden administration officials “repeatedly pressured” Meta, the parent of social media platform Facebook, to “censor” content related to COVID-19, which he said included “humor and satire.”
Zuckerberg added that the administration shared “a lot of frustration” with teams at Meta when they disagreed on content decisions but said the final decisions on whether or not to remove content were made by the company.
He said, however, that while the company would “own” its decisions, including surrounding the removal of COVID-19 content, he believed the “government pressure was wrong.”
“I regret that we were not more outspoken about it,” Zuckerberg wrote. “I also think we made some choices that with the benefit of hindsight and new information, we wouldn’t make today.”
“Like I said to our teas at the time, I feel strongly that we should not compromise our content standards due to pressure from any administration in either direction — and we’re ready to push back if something like this happens again.”
Meta in 2021 said it removed 20 million pieces of content that violated its COVID-19-related misinformation policies worldwide and removed 3,000 accounts, pages and groups that repeatedly violated the associated rules.
The House Judiciary Committee GOP, which shared, the letter on its Facebook page declared the letter a “big win for free speech.”
The White House responded to the letter in a statement to Politico, saying that it “encouraged responsible actions to protect public health and safety” after having been “confronted with a deadly pandemic.”
“Our position has been clear and consistent: we believe tech companies and other private actors should take into account the effects their actions have on the American people, while making independent choices about the information they present,” it said.
The U.S. Supreme Court in June tossed out a challenge by two states and five social media users and overturned a lower court’s decision that would have limited the interaction between government officials and social media companies.
They had alleged that the federal government pressured social media platforms to suppress First Amendment speech related to COVID-19 as well as the 2020 presidential election and 2022 midterms but the Supreme Court ruled they lacked standing as they failed to link the social media restrictions to the government’s communications with the platforms.
COMMENTS
Please let us know if you're having issues with commenting.