Peru Presidential Runoff: A Critical Election For A Hemisphere

Humala in bad company-here with Hugo Chavez.

On the surface the Peru presidential runoff election is, which according to polls, is too close to call. It is between the radical socialist nationalist Ollanta Humala and the free market Keiko Fujimori. In reality this is a political contest heavily influenced by the international Foro de Sao Paulo (FSP). In 1990 the FSP was formed by the Workers’ Party of Brazil and the Cuban Communist Party. It called together all the Latin American communist parties; radical groups; Marxist parties; terrorist groups like FARC, MRTA, and ELN; and Trotsky group. In essence the Foro de Sao Paulo is a modern regional counterpart to the former Communist Internationals once held by the Soviet Union COMINTERN.

Alejandro Pena-Esclusa in his book “The Foro de Sao Paulo, A Threat to Freedom in Latin America” (Mary Montes Edition, Bogota, Colombia), describes the radical political and economic objectives of the FSP. The FSP objective is for radical political groups to take over control of cities, states, nations, and regions through the ballot box versus violent revolution. The FSP is a direct threat to the freedoms of Latin American nations. The rise of Chavez in Venezuela is the prime example of the radical “demogogo” destroying the freedoms and economy of his nation.

In Peru the PT, the Brazilian Workers Party through Valter Pomar, is the advisor to Humala. Pomar, a director of the FSP, is known as a member of the extreme radical left in the PT. Chavez , the radical demogogo also is an influence behind Humala. Now Chavez is keeping a low profile in the Peru election. Google “Alerta Peru” for the leftist web site in which in March, 2010, Mr. Chavez called for a real revolution in Peru.

In relative terms Keiko Fujimori looks like a viable moderate with a free market program comparable to the leftish Humala, supported by the FSP, PT, and Chavez.

June 5 with be a critical election in Peru.