CA Democrats Expand Red Flag Law Again, Lengthen Confiscatory Period
Democrats expanded California’s Red Flag Law again by lengthening the confiscatory period and broadening the number of people who can push for confiscation to begin with.
Democrats expanded California’s Red Flag Law again by lengthening the confiscatory period and broadening the number of people who can push for confiscation to begin with.
Hawaii State Senate Democrats issued a resolution last week to “repeal or amend” the Second Amendment.
California’s newest gun controls demonstrate the insidious nature of red flag laws and the danger they pose to the Second Amendment.
Aspects of California’s gun confiscation laws broadened on January 1, 2019, as the state added ammunition and certain magazines to the list of items that can be confiscated when firearms are seized.
In April of this year a mental health crisis team chose not to involuntarily commit Thousand Oaks gunman Ian David Long for mental health treatment/evaluation.
Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) have rarely been invoked to take away the guns of an individual deemed a danger to himself or others.
A California Senate committee and an Assembly committee passed a total of seven new gun control bills during the past week.
The NRA announced support for firearm confiscation orders on the same day the White House announced its support for allowing the guns of citizens to be taken away via court order.
California Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) have emerged as a model that could be followed for gun control proposals put forward by D.C. politicians and Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R).
During Friday’s Democratic Weekly Address, Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) stated she hopes President Trump’s statements at a gun violence discussion “can be a lesson for the Congress that Republicans need to finally allow Congress” to pass reforms like banning assault
On Friday, Fox News Channel host Shepard Smith argued that President Trump’s statement on due process and gun violence restraining orders “is as un-American as imaginable.” Smith said, “[T]he president of the United States said, if you see somebody who doesn’t
On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox Business Network’s “Varney & Co.,” Senator John Kennedy (R-LA) reacted to President Trump’s comments on due process and gun violence restraining orders by stating, “if you trust government, you obviously failed history class.” Kennedy said,
On Thursday’s broadcast of the Fox News Channel’s “Special Report,” Senator Ben Sasse (R-NE) responded to President Trump’s comments on due process and gun violence restraining orders by stating that the president’s approach is putting government first and it’s “not
On Wednesday’s “CNN Tonight,” Representative Elizabeth Esty (D-CT) argued in favor of gun violence restraining orders and stated, “But you’ve got to have due process. And, frankly, not to have due process would be wrong.” Esty said that the “real
The American Bar Association is pushing state and local governments to adopt firearm confiscation laws similar to those in California.
John Hopkins University’s Shannon Frattaroli sees danger in gun ownership among senior citizens, and points out that California’s Gun Violence Restraining Orders (GVROs) provide a way that families can have guns confiscated from older relatives.
On January 14 the Los Angeles Times observed that California pursues more gun control than other states thanks to Democrat rule.
Campus Carry for concealed carry permit holders becomes illegal on January 1, the same day on which police get expanded powers for firearm confiscation.
Beginning January 1, police in California may confiscate firearms from gun owners thought to be a danger to themselves or others without giving the owner any notice.
On August 13, Governor Jerry Brown (D) signed an NRA-backed bill which protects the guns of those subject to a Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO).
Last week a New Jersey appellate court upheld the ruling that a southern New Jersey man cannot own guns because his wife is a felon “who’s been accused of domestic violence.”
On May 27, a National Journal article quoted UCLA law professor Adam Winkler saying a Gun Violence Restraining Order (GVRO) really will “not … make a huge dent in our gun violence statistics.”
On Tuesday, the California States Assembly Committee on Public Safety heard Assemblywoman Melissa Melendez’s (R) AB 225 and tied the vote 3-3.
On March 17, California’s Assembly Committee on Public Safety will hear Assemblywoman Melissa Melendez’s (R-Elsinore) bill to protect law-abiding citizens from “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” (GVROs).
On February 11 the attorney for former California state employee Bryan Keith Thurmond argued that Thurmond made an “innocent mistake” in allegedly bringing “a loaded pistol, three knives, and an extra [ammunition] magazine” to the secretary of state’s office on January 19.
California Assemblywoman Melissa Melendez (R-Lake Elsinore) has introduced legislation to protect Californians from being falsely accused of gun violence in the new era of “Gun Violence Restraining Orders” (GVROs).